After flipping through the pages of Everyday Food Magazine and finding a “lighter” version of sesame chicken without the nutritional facts attached, how can I be so sure it is lighter? There was nothing to compare it to, what is so light about it? I guess the fact that the chicken is “lightly” fried instead of deep fried as it would be made in a Chinese restaurant could pass as a lighter version of the popular dish, but what are they trying to hide by not telling me the nutritional facts at the end?
Sunset magazine on the other hand doesn’t even try to hide the fact that a cup of its “healthier” version of cream of mushroom soup is 394 calories and 27g of fat. I am no expert on food education myself, but personally one cup of soup wouldn’t cut it and the calorie and fat intake is already high to start eating more. The magazine also highlights every recipe with the nutritional ingredients at the end.
Overall the reader should be aware of the “everyday” recipes being presented and know the portion size to indulge in, though what still makes food publications the voice of what is good and healthy to eat? Who are these expert food writers and what qualifies them to tell the readers what is good enough? There are food writers that should be listened to on the topic of nutrition, but know who you are listening to.
No comments:
Post a Comment